Tag Archives: pronouns

Grammar: Pronouns Part XVI—Relative Antecedents

Like most pronouns, the relative pronouns who, which, and that have antecedents—nouns or pronouns to which they refer. Usually the antecedent to a relative pronoun appears in the main clause of the sentence. For clarity, the relative pronoun should immediately follow its antecedent:

Yesterday was Valentine’s Day, a holiday that popular belief claims is named after a third-century priest who was executed for performing illegal marriage ceremonies.

Subject-Verb Agreement

Relative pronouns that are the subjects of subordinate clauses take verbs that agree with their antecedents:

Some argue that Valentine’s Day is a holiday that was invented—or at least heavily marketed—by Hallmark.

Questions arise with sentences that include the phrases one of the and only one of the. Chicago prescribes treating one of the constructions as plural and only one of the constructions as singular:

Due to these marketing efforts, Valentine’s Day is one of the few holidays that are celebrated throughout the world.

It is the only one of the myriad holidays that is dedicated to romantic love.

Don’t try applying this guideline on the SAT, though where one is always just that: one—i.e., singular.

Omitted Antecedents

If there isn’t an antecedent, however, what can be used to mean that which:

Is that what you meant by sending me a Valentine’s Day card?

The Mots Justes Series on Pronouns

Part I—The Basics

Part II—Location, Location, Location

Part III—Number

Part IV—Person

Part V—Gender, Plus “They” as a Gender-Neutral Singular Pronoun

Part VI—On the Case

Part VII—Something Personal Between You and Me

Part VIII—Infinitives

Part IX—Indeterminate Gender

Part X—Indefinitely (We, You, and They)

Part XI—Indefinitely (It)

Part XII—Possession

Part XIII—Demonstrative

Part XIV—Interrogative

Part XV—Relative

Resources

Chicago Manual of Style, The. 15th ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.

Hacker, Diana, The Bedford Handbook for Writers, 3rd ed. Boston: St. Martin’s Press: 1991.

Leave a comment

Filed under grammar

Grammar: Pronouns Part XV—Relative

Relative pronouns—who, whom, whose, which, that, and what—introduce a relative (or subordinate) clause and relates it to the rest of the sentence.

Who Vs. Whom

Who is in subjective case. It can be used when the relative pronoun serves as the subject of the subordinate clause:

Led by Brett Favre, who played quarterback at rival Green Bay for fifteen years, the Minnesota Vikings are one game away from the Super Bowl.

Whom is in objective case. It can also be used in two situations: as the object of a verb or the object of a preposition:

Brad Childress, whom the team hired four years ago, has finally coached the Vikings to the NFC Championship game.

Crucial to the Vikings win yesterday was Sidney Rice, to whom Favre threw three touchdown passes.

If you’re having a hard time figuring out whether the relative pronoun is in subjective or objective case, substitute he or him, rewriting the sentence as necessary:

Led by Brett Favre, the Minnesota Vikings are one game away from the Super Bowl. He played quarterback at rival Green Bay for years.

Brad Childress has finally coached the Vikings to the NFC Championship game. The team hired him four years ago.

Crucial to the Vikings win yesterday was Sidney Rice. Favre threw three touchdown passes to him.

If you would use he in the sentence, then use who. If you would use him in the sentence, use whom. Just remember that the m’s in him and whom go together.

Whose is in the possessive case and thus shows ownership:

Adrian Peterson, whose running game is a constant threat, had a relatively quiet game.

Who Vs. Which Vs. That Vs. What

Use who, whom, and whose only when referring to a person. They can be used in first, second, or third person. (See examples above.)

Use which only when referring to an animal or thing:

The team, which got skunked in its last division championship by the New York Giants in 2001, goes into New Orleans with a definitive win against Dallas.

Use what only when referring to a nonliving thing:

The drubbing was exactly what the Vikings needed going into next week’s game against the Saints.

Both which and what can be used in the second or third person, but not in the first.

Use that to refer to a person, animal, or thing. It can be used in the first, second, or third person:

In the locker room after the game, Favre sang the “Pants on the Ground” song that was made famous on American Idol.

For the difference between that and which, see this previous post on comma use with subordinate clauses.

Compound Relative Pronouns

Compound relative pronouns are formed by adding the suffice -ever­ to who, whom, what, or which. Whoever, whomever, whatever, and whichever don’t point back to a noun or pronoun but refer generally to any or all people or things:

Whomever the Vikings face in the rest of the playoffs will be formidable opponents.

Whatever happens next weekend, the Vikings had a fun and exciting season.

Do you have a question about pronouns? Let me know, and I’ll include it in a future installment of Mots Justes’ ongoing series.

The Mots Justes Series on Pronouns

Part I—The Basics

Part II—Location, Location, Location

Part III—Number

Part IV—Person

Part V—Gender, Plus “They” as a Gender-Neutral Singular Pronoun

Part VI—On the Case

Part VII—Something Personal Between You and Me

Part VIII—Infinitives

Part IX—Indeterminate Gender

Part X—Indefinitely (We, You, and They)

Part XI—Indefinitely (It)

Part XII—Possession

Part XIII—Demonstrative

Part XIV—Interrogative

Resources

Chicago Manual of Style, The. 15th ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.

Hacker, Diana, The Bedford Handbook for Writers, 3rd ed. Boston: St. Martin’s Press: 1991.

2 Comments

Filed under grammar

Monday Morning Grammar: Pronouns Part XIV—Interrogative

Interrogative pronouns—who, whom, whose, which, and what—introduce questions.

Who Vs. Whom

Who is in subjective case. It can be used in two situations: as the subject of a verb or as the predicate nominative after a linking verb:

Who hosted a Halloween party this year?

It was who?

Whom is in objective case. It can also be used in two situations: as the object of a verb or preposition:

Whom did you invite to your Halloween party?

As whom did you dress for your costume?

If you’re having a hard time figuring out whether the interrogative pronoun is in subjective or objective case, substitute he or him, rewriting the sentence as necessary:

He hosted a Halloween party this year.

You invited him to your Halloween party.

If you would use he in the sentence, then use who. If you would use him in the sentence, use whom. Just remember that the m’s in him and whom go together.

Whose is in the possessive case and thus shows ownership:

Whose costume was best at the party?

Who Vs. Which

When working as interrogative pronouns, who and which can both refer to people, but their uses differ.

Who is general. Use it when anyone could be the answer:

Who wants to go trick-or-treating this year?

Who also asks about the identity of a specific person:

Who is that woman dressed as a witch?

Which is limited, asking for a member of a group:

Which Beatle are you supposed to be?

Which Vs. What

Either which or what can be used when referring to a person or thing:

Which one of you made your own costume?

What kind of candy did you hand out to trick-or-treaters this year?

When used in reference to a person, what asks a question about that person—what they’re like, what they do, etc.:

What do you think of the party’s host?

When used in reference to a thing, what is used broadly to ask for a thing, especially among a set:

What are you supposed to be?

What was the best costume of the night?

Do you have a question about pronouns? Let me know, and I’ll include it in a future installment of Mots Justes’ ongoing series.

The Mots Justes Series on Pronouns

Part I—The Basics

Part II—Location, Location, Location

Part III—Number

Part IV—Person

Part V—Gender, Plus “They” as a Gender-Neutral Singular Pronoun

Part VI—On the Case

Part VII—Something Personal Between You and Me

Part VIII—Infinitives

Part IX—Indeterminate Gender

Part X—Indefinitely (We, You, and They)

Part XI—Indefinitely (It)

Part XII—Possession

Part XIII—Demonstrative

Resources

Chicago Manual of Style, The. 15th ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.

Hacker, Diana, The Bedford Handbook for Writers, 3rd ed. Boston: St. Martin’s Press: 1991.

Leave a comment

Filed under grammar

Monday Morning Grammar: Pronouns Part XIII—Demonstrative

This, that, these, and those are demonstrative pronouns—or, if you want to get fancy about it, deictic pronouns—that identify or point directly to their antecedents.

This and that are used for singular antecedents:

This is my professional blog about “finding the right words.”

That is my personal blog about staycationing in Los Angeles.

These and those are used for plural antecedents:

These are posts about writing and editing.

Those are posts about getting out and being a tourist in my hometown.

In all of the examples given so far, the demonstrative pronoun has functioned like a noun equivalent in the sentence, but demonstrative pronouns often work as adjectives:

I have been posting to this blog for over a year.

I just started that blog last month.

This and these refer to things that are nearby, whether in time, space, or thought, while these and those refer to things that are farther away.

The antecedent for a demonstrative pronoun can be a noun, phrase, clause, sentence, or implied thought, as long as it’s clear.

Kinda Sorta

Kind of and sort of, when use to mean “a class of,” are often used with adjectival forms of demonstrative pronouns:

This kind of professional blog helps me learn more about my craft while connecting me with other writers and editors.

Those sorts of personal blogs provide structure to my free time while giving me another outlet for creative writing.

Do you have a question about pronouns? Let me know, and I’ll include it in a future installment of Mots Justes’ ongoing series.

The Mots Justes Series on Pronouns

Part I—The Basics

Part II—Location, Location, Location

Part III—Number

Part IV—Person

Part V—Gender, Plus “They” as a Gender-Neutral Singular Pronoun

Part VI—On the Case

Part VII—Something Personal Between You and Me

Part VIII—Infinitives

Part IX—Indeterminate Gender

Part X—Indefinitely (We, You, and They)

Part XI—Indefinitely (It)

Part XII—Possession

Resources

Chicago Manual of Style, The. 15th ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.

Hacker, Diana, The Bedford Handbook for Writers, 3rd ed. Boston: St. Martin’s Press: 1991.

Leave a comment

Filed under grammar

Monday Morning Grammar: Pronouns Part XI—Indefinitely (It)

Monday Morning Grammar: Pronouns Part XI—Indefinitely (It)

It is SAT season, and one of the rules I emphasize with my students as they prepare for the test is that personal pronouns always need to have a clear antecedent. (Two exceptions, even on the SAT, are I and you, whose antecedents—the person speaking or writing and the person being spoken or written to—are implied.) However, in everyday language, it is often used as an indefinite pronoun.

The pronoun it can be used to refer to a phrase, clause, sentence, or idea that’s implied but not explicitly stated:

In yesterday’s Vikings game against the 49ers, Brett Favre threw a game-winning touchdown with just two seconds left on the clock. You have to see it to believe it.

In this example, you can infer that it refers to the play: You have to see the play to believe it.

It can be the subject of a sentence without having an antecedent. Usually the verb in such a sentence is a form of to be:

It was amazing.

It can also open a sentence and introduce a phrase or clause that comes after the verb:

It is strange to see Favre wearing purple after he played for so many years in Packers green.

And it can introduce a subject or object before it appears in a sentence:

I find it hard to get used to this new world order.

Finally, it can serve as a subject in a sentence discussing time or the weather:

It is autumn; it has finally cooled down.

However, although I’ve been known to favor starting sentences with It’s …—check out the first sentence of this post, for example—I wouldn’t recommend it in academic writing because your meaning can become muddled:

Everywhere I go, even at the Goodwill donation center, people want to talk about Favre. It is exciting.

What is exciting? Favre? Or that everyone wants to talk about him?

Friends of my family have a nephew who plays for the Packers. It is a good opportunity.

What is a good opportunity? Ostensibly, it’s the nephew’s position on the team, but the antecedent isn’t clear.

Do you have a question about pronouns? Let me know, and I’ll include it in a future installment of Mots Justes’ ongoing series.

The Mots Justes Series on Pronouns

Part I—The Basics

Part II—Location, Location, Location

Part III—Number

Part IV—Person

Part V—Gender, Plus “They” as a Gender-Neutral Singular Pronoun

Part VI—On the Case

Part VII—Something Personal Between You and Me

Part VIII—Infinitives

Part IX—Indeterminate Gender

Part X—Indefinitely (We, You, and They)

Resource

Chicago Manual of Style, The. 15th ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.

Leave a comment

Filed under grammar

Monday Morning Grammar: Pronouns Part VIII—Infinitives

Quickie post today since it’s Labor Day!

When a pronoun is used with an infinitive—i.e., to plus a verb’s root or stem—use objective case. This rule holds true whether the pronoun is the object of the infinitive or the subject:

Jeff wanted me to accompany him to his stepbrother’s wedding this weekend.

The morning after the ceremony, Jeff’s mother asked us to help tear down the wedding decorations and clean up the reception venue.

Do you have a question about pronouns? Let me know, and I’ll include it in a future installment of Mots Justes’ ongoing series.

The Mots Justes Series on Pronouns

Part I—The Basics

Part II—Location, Location, Location

Part III—Number

Part IV—Person

Part V—Gender, Plus “They” as a Gender-Neutral Singular Pronoun

Part VI—On the Case

Part VII—Something Personal Between You and Me

Resources

Chicago Manual of Style, The. 15th ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.

Leave a comment

Filed under grammar

Monday Morning Grammar: Pronouns Part VII—Something Personal Between You and Me

Even my sharpest students get tripped up by compounds involving pronouns. As soon as we simplify the sentence, however, removing the rest of the compound phrase and isolating the pronoun, the correct usage becomes clear. Don’t let compounds and other complex sentence structures complicate your use of the correct pronoun case.

As discussed last week, if a pronoun is the subject of a sentence or independent clause or a predicate nominative after a linking verb, use subjective case. This doesn’t change if your subject or predicate nominative is compound.

It was so hot in Los Angeles this weekend that Jeff and I spent Saturday afternoon at his air-conditioned office.

The only people there were a couple of editors, he, and I.

In cases like these, your ear isn’t always reliable. It might sound just fine to say Jeff and me spent Saturday afternoon at his air-conditioned office or the only people there were a couple of editors, him, and me. To make sure you’re using the right case, simplify the sentence: get rid of the rest of the compound phrase and isolate the pronoun:

It was so hot in Los Angeles this weekend that I spent Saturday afternoon at Jeff’s air-conditioned office.

The only person there was I.

You wouldn’t say me spent Saturday afternoon …, so don’t let the compound phrase confuse you.

Likewise, use objective case when a pronoun is the direct or indirect object of a verb or object of a preposition, even when the pronoun is part of a compound phrase:

Anthony invited Jeff and me to cool off at his place, which is also air conditioned.

Because there are so many computers running at Jeff’s office, the air conditioning was cranked so high that it gave him and me goose bumps.

Still, the chill was a relief to him and me.

It is examples like these to which my students confidently declare that the sentences should read Jeff and I or he and I. But they’re engaging in hypercorrection—and I has been so drilled into them that it sounds right to them, whether the subjective or objective case is required. Yet, when we simplify the compound phrase, the correct case becomes clear:

Anthony invited me to cool off at his place, which is also air conditioned.

Because there are so many computers running at Jeff’s office, the air conditioning was cranked so high that it gave me goose bumps.

Still, the chill was a relief to him.

Do you have a question about pronouns? Let me know, and I’ll include it in a future installment of Mots Justes’ ongoing series.

The Mots Justes Series on Pronouns

Part I—The Basics

Part II—Location, Location, Location

Part III—Number

Part IV—Person

Part V—Gender, Plus “They” as a Gender-Neutral Singular Pronoun

Part VI—On the Case

Resources

Chicago Manual of Style, The. 15th ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.

Fogarty, Mignon, Grammar Girl’s Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing. New York: Holt Paperbacks, 2008.

Hacker, Diana, The Bedford Handbook for Writers, 3rd ed. Boston: St. Martin’s Press: 1991.

Leave a comment

Filed under grammar

Monday Morning Grammar: Pronouns Part VI—On the Case

Usually when we talk about pronouns, what immediately come to mind are personal pronouns—I, you, he, she, it, etc.—that refer to specific people or things. As discussed over the past couple of weeks, pronouns, like nouns, have four properties—number, person, gender, and case. Having already discussed the first three properties, let’s turn our attention to case, which almost exclusively applies to personal pronouns.

Case refers to how a noun or pronoun functions in a sentence. If a pronoun serves as the subject of a sentence or clause, it should be in subjective, or nominative, case:

Last Friday, I attended a sneak peek of James Cameron’s Avatar.

He hasn’t directed a feature film since 1997’s Titanic.

If a pronoun serves as a predicate nominative after a linking verb, it should also be in subjective case:

It was I who on Monday afternoon reserved tickets for the event.

It was he who introduced the footage, appearing larger than life on the giant Imax screen.

Be careful that you don’t let your ear mislead you. In everyday speech, incorrect forms of predicate nominatives (It was me …, It was him …) are used all the time because we tend to assign objective case to any pronoun that follows the verb.

A pronoun should be in objective case, however, when it serves as the direct or indirect object to a verb or the object of a preposition:

When Cameron appeared on the screen, the audience applauded him.

When we entered the theater, an employee handed us 3D glasses.

Although the auditorium was almost full, there was an empty seat by me.

Although case applies to both nouns and pronouns, only some pronouns change their form according to how they function in a sentence. In the first-person singular, the personal pronoun I should be used in the subjective case:

I arrived ninety minutes early for the screening.

(I is always capitalized. All other pronouns are only capitalized when they start a sentence or are used as part of an honorific title, such as Her Majesty.)

However, when you need a first-person singular pronoun in objective case, use me:

Even though I arrived so early, there were already fifteen people in line in front of me.

Likewise, in the first-person plural, we is used in the subjective case, while us is used in the objective case:

We waited patiently in the queue while late arrivers lined up after us.

In the second-person, the personal pronoun you is used, whether singular or plural and whether subjective or objective case:

I told my boyfriend, “You should have been there.”

He replied, “I had to work and couldn’t go with you.”

Readers, you may have missed the sneak peek, but I encourage you to check out the trailer online.

You always takes a plural verb, whether singular or plural.

In the third-person, the singular subjective-case pronouns he and she become him and her in the objective case.

The theater’s general manager welcomed the audience to the screening. She gave us discount coupons to the box office and concessions stand.

The audience laughed at her, however, when she told us we could buy tickets to the movie when it came out December 18.

A representative from Fox introduced the footage. He encouraged us to see the movie when it comes out later this year.

Eager for the show to start, the audience clapped politely for him.

It, however, stays the same whether in subjective or objective case:

Finally, it started.

The audience members put on their 3D glasses to watch it.

Finally, in the third-person plural, use they for the subjective case but them for the objective case:

They were among the first to see scenes from the film.

Three more screenings were scheduled for more audiences to see it after them.

Overall, only seven words in the English language change form depending on how they function in the sentence: I/me, we/us, he/him, she/her, they/them, who/whom, and whoever/whomever.

This table summarizes the numbers, persons, and cases of personal pronouns:

Singular Pronouns

Nominative                        Objective

First Person                        I                                        me
Second Person                 you                                     you
Third Person               he, she, it                         him, her, it

Plural Pronouns

Nominative                        Objective

First Person                      we                                      us
Second Person                 you                                    you
Third Person                   they                                  them

Personal Pronouns and Their Relatives

Here are a few guidelines for personal pronouns working alongside relative pronouns.

When a relative pronoun is followed by a personal pronoun and they both refer to the same antecedent, the personal pronoun matches the antecedent in gender and number:

I sat next to a man who brought his young son.

When a relative pronoun is followed by a personal pronoun that refers to a different antecedent, however, the personal pronoun matches its own antecedent—not that of the relative pronoun—in gender and number:

I also sat next to a man and a woman who had invited him along even though he’s not a fan of science fiction.

However, personal and relative pronouns working together do not have to match in case.

He deferred to her, who was an expert on the genre.

In this example, the objective pronoun her is the antecedent of who, which is in the nominative case. (We’ll talk about the difference between who and whom in a future post.)

Do you have a question about pronouns? Let me know, and I’ll include it in a future installment of Mots Justes’ ongoing series.

The Mots Justes Series on Pronouns

Part I—The Basics

Part II—Location, Location, Location

Part III—Number

Part IV—Person

Part V—Gender, Plus “They” as a Gender-Neutral Singular Pronoun

To read my writeup on the Avatar sneak peek, visit Moving Pictures Magazine.

Resources

Chicago Manual of Style, The. 15th ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.

Fogarty, Mignon, Grammar Girl’s Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing. New York: Holt Paperbacks, 2008.

Hacker, Diana, The Bedford Handbook for Writers, 3rd ed. Boston: St. Martin’s Press: 1991.

Strunk Jr., William, and White, E.B. The Elements of Style. 4th ed. New York: Longman, 2000.

Leave a comment

Filed under grammar

Monday Morning Grammar: Pronouns Part V—Gender, Plus “They” as a Gender-Neutral Singular Pronoun

As discussed over the last couple of weeks, pronouns, like nouns, have four properties—number, person, gender, and case—and should agree with their antecedents in number, person, and gender. We’ve already talked about how pronouns agree with their antecedents in number and person, and so far it’s been pretty straightforward. Gender agreement, too, seems obvious, but a sticky point arises that raises hackles from Twitter to the New York Times.

Of the three points of view, only third-person pronouns express the gender (he, she, him, her, his, and hers) of their antecedents:

This weekend, I saw Julie & Julia with my friend Sandra. She and I decided to make the film’s signature dish, boeuf bourguignon.

Sandra was going to the farmers market on Saturday morning, so I gave her a shopping list that included carrots, onions, and mushrooms.

This next point is pretty basic, but Chicago thinks it’s worth mentioning, so I will, too. Make sure that possessive pronouns take the gender of the possessor, not who or what is being possessed:

We decided to throw a last-minute dinner party, so Sarah invited her friend P.T. and his fiancée Lisa.

If a pronoun refers to antecedents of different genders that are connected by and, use a plural pronoun:

P.T. and Lisa couldn’t make it to the dinner party, however, and sent their apologies.

However, if a pronoun refers to one of the antecedents of different genders connect by and, apply the gender of the referent noun:

P.T. and Lisa couldn’t make it to the dinner party because he had to drop her off at the airport that night.

This is all just common sense.

His or Her and They

It gets tricky—and controversial—when antecedents of different genders or unspecified genders are joined by or or nor.

Neither Joey nor Elizabeth came because ______ couldn’t change ______ plans on such short notice.

Traditionally, the blanks above would be filled by he and his, but many readers and writers today find this solution sexist and/or misleading:

Neither Joey nor Elizabeth came because he couldn’t change his plans on such short notice.

Using the gender of the closest antecedent can also be misleading:

Neither Joey nor Elizabeth came because she couldn’t change her plans on such short notice.

What’s grammatically correct in this case some readers and writers find awkward:

Neither Joey nor Elizabeth came because he or she couldn’t change his or her plans on such short notice.

Some writers abbreviate he or she to he/she or s/he, but Chicago advises against it. These alternatives are probably okay in everyday writing, but I’d avoid it in business or other formal writing.

Others have addressed the sexism issue by alternating their use of he and she, but this can get really confusing:

Neither Joey nor Elizabeth came because he couldn’t change her plans on such short notice.

There’s a pretty strong movement to adopt them as an accepted gender-neutral singular pronoun:

Neither Joey nor Elizabeth came because they couldn’t change their plans on such short notice.

A paper no less esteemed than the Gray Lady herself advocated this solution, citing historical precedent, and progressive grammarian Grammar Girl is “a firm believer that someday they will be the acceptable choice for this situation.”

However, I just can’t condone it. If you do use them as a gender-neutral singular pronoun, however carefully reasoned and justified your decision, to a reader, it may look like a mistake, threatening your credibility with him or her. The best solution is to rewrite the offending sentence if you can, often simply by making the antecedent plural:

To readers, it may look like a mistake, threatening your credibility with them.

Do you have a question about pronouns? Let me know, and I’ll include it in a future installment of Mots Justes’ ongoing series.

The Mots Justes Series on Pronouns

Part I—The Basics

Part II—Location, Location, Location

Part III—Number

Part IV—Person

Resources

Chicago Manual of Style, The. 15th ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.

Fogarty, Mignon, Grammar Girl’s Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing. New York: Holt Paperbacks, 2008.

5 Comments

Filed under grammar

Monday Morning Grammar: Pronouns Part IV—Person

As discussed last week, pronouns, like nouns, have four properties—number, person, gender, and case—and should agree with their antecedents in number, person, and gender. We’ve already discussed how pronouns agree with their antecedents in number. Let’s now take a look at person:

Person refers to the point of view of a passage. First person is the writer or speaker’s point of view and uses the pronouns I, we, etc.

I went on a mini road trip with my friend Sandra last week.

Second person is the point of view of the person being written or spoken to and uses you, etc.

You were unable to come along because you had to work.

And third person is the point of view of the person or thing being written or spoken about and uses he, she, it, they, etc.

She wanted to visit her friend Stephen before he moved back to San Diego.

Sometimes a pronoun refers to two or more antecedents that differ in person, but the pronoun can be of only one person. In cases like these, first person is better than second person, and second person is better than third:

You and I should plan a getaway of our own.

Here, you is second person, and I is first person. Both are antecedents to our, but our can be of only one person. Since first person is better than second, use our instead of your.

You and Anthony should plan your trip.

Here, you is second person, and Anthony is third person. Both are antecedents to your, but your can be of only one person. Since second person is better than third, use your instead of their.

This rule only applies, however, when the pronoun refers to both of the connected nouns or pronouns. If a pronoun refers to only one of two or more nouns or pronouns connected by and, or, or nor, then it should take the person of that antecedent:

You and Anthony should make plans for when he has time off.

Do you have a question about pronouns? Let me know, and I’ll include it in a future installment of Mots Justes’ ongoing series.

The Mots Justes Series on Pronouns

Part I—The Basics

Part II—Location, Location, Location

Part III—Number

Resources

Chicago Manual of Style, The. 15th ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.

Hacker, Diana, The Bedford Handbook for Writers, 3rd ed. Boston: St. Martin’s Press: 1991.

Leave a comment

Filed under grammar