Tag Archives: Southern California Review

SCR Makes the NewPages

NewPages.com just posted a nice write-up of Southern California Review:

Unlike other journals, SCR distinguishes itself by publishing plays. It also features fiction, poetry and a long interview with the novelist and short story writer Nathan Englander, named by the New Yorker as one of the best American writers under forty.

The review also specifically cited Judith Freeman’s short story “Chandler Takes a Walk” and Kristina Sisco Romero’s unusual bio (“A daytime Emmy nominated actress for her role on the soap As the World Turns, she also appears in the Sci-Fi Channel’s Sands of Oblivion and NBC’s Passions.”).

Thanks, NewPages!

Leave a comment

Filed under uncategorized

SCR Shout-Out

Over at Emerging Writers Network, Dan Wickett had some nice things to say about the inaugural issue of Southern California Review:

The issue has three excellent short stories from Gary Fincke, Michael Buckley and Judith Freeman, as well as a nice essay by Christopher Buckley, and a ton of great poetry, including the top three entrants into the Nineteenth Annual Ann Stanford Poetry Prize, not to mention a one act play, a stageplay, and an interview of Nathan Englander by John Fox that was very entertaining.

It’s an excellent rebirth for this journal …

Thank you, Dan!

Leave a comment

Filed under uncategorized

Letters to the Editor

One of the things I do in my spare time—which I have more of since I left my magazine editorship—is serve as (volunteer) editor-in-chief of Southern California Review (SCR), the literary journal published by the Master of Professional Writing Program at the University of Southern California. So, even though I’m in Cambridge for three weeks studying fiction and screenwriting, I spent an afternoon last week taking care of some SCR business—namely, sending out the press release announcing the winner of our annual poetry prize.

I sent out hundreds of emails to readers and writers who had entered the contest, submitted material for publication, signed up for more information about the magazine, etc. A few then took the opportunity to get in touch.

I got a couple of requests to “please remove me from your mailing list.” Fair enough.

I also got an inquiry from a submitter who took offense that we had passed on one of his stories without including a form rejection. After I assured him that it must have been an oversight, however, he seemed satisfied.

And then there are the outright hostile emails that engender responses such as Fence‘s earlier this year.

I haven’t decided yet how I feel about the publication of correspondence that might be assumed by the author to be private (cover letters, email exchanges, internal comments on submissions, etc.). I’m certainly not in a position to do so on my private blog-we’re not the scrappy independent publication we’d probably like to be but have a faculty adviser and program director as well as the university itself to answer to.

But I can say that I have received some angry, accusatory, completely unfounded complaints—all of which I responded to politely and professionally. In every case, one of two things has happened: I never heard from the letter writer again, or they were pleased to have received a reply and respond in kind. The situation has never escalated to personal attacks.

Not that I don’t feel frustrated, as I’m sure the writers do. It’s just that a little restraint on both sides would be well-served.

Leave a comment

Filed under business of writing